Mandy's Ltd et al v. TimePayment Corp., et al

Filing 36

MINUTE ORDER Striking 35 Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Response to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment filed January 21, 2016, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 1/26/2016.(evana, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01571-WYD-MJW
MANDY’S LTD, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, and
AMANDA MACHAN, an Individual,
Plaintiffs,
v.
TIMEPAYMENT CORP., a Delaware corporation, and
SALON AND BEAUTY SOURCE, INC., a Florida corporation, doing business as
SalonSmart,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY SENIOR JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment filed January 21, 2016 (ECF No. 35) is STRICKEN as it fails to comply with
D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1. While Plaintiffs stated they conferred with defense counsel “by
telephone message”, this is not sufficient to comply with the rule. A party must make a
good faith effort to confer with opposing counsel, not simply leave a message, and must
advise the court after conferring with counsel as to whether the motion is opposed or
unopposed. Plaintiffs may refile the motion after making appropriate efforts to confer as
required by the Local Rule.
Also, Plaintiffs are advised in the future to use the correct format for their caption,
as displayed in this Minute Order. This format is shown on the Court’s website in the
Forms (Sample Pleading - Civil).
Dated: January 26, 2016

-1-