Chang v. Vail Resorts, Inc. et al

Filing 47

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Motion Hearing held on 11/3/2015 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. A response to the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) 16 is due on or before 11/10/2015. A resp onse to Defendants Half Moon Bay Limited and Great House Limited's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens 29 is due on or before 11/10/2015. Motion for Leave to Take Expedited Discovery Regarding Personal Jurisdiction and to Stay the Remainder of the Case Pending the Court's Determination of Jurisdiction Issues 32 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. FTR: Courtroom C-204. (bsimm, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE NINA Y. WANG

Civil Action:
Courtroom Deputy:

15-cv-01731-REB-NYW
Brandy Simmons

Parties

Date: November 3, 2015
FTR: NYW COURTROOM C-204*
Counsel

DR. LENA CHANG,

Neal Stuart Cohen
Plaintiff,

v.
VAIL RESORTS, INC.,
ROCKRESORTS INTERNATIONAL, LLC,
GREAT HOUSE LIMITED,
HALF MOON BAY LIMITED,

Jonathan George Pray
Kerry Jean LeMonte
Christopher J. L. Diedrich
James D. Kilroy

Defendants.

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

MOTION HEARING
Court in Session: 1:02 p.m.
Appearance of counsel.
Discussion held on Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Purusant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)
[16] filed September 3, 2015. Plaintiff has not filed a response in the time period contemplated
by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(d).
ORDERED: A response to the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) [16] is due on or before November 10, 2015.

Discussion held on Defendants Half Moon Bay Limited and Great House Limited’s Motion to
Dismiss Pursuant to the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens [29] filed September 14, 2015.
Plaintiff has not filed a response in the time period contemplated by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(d).
ORDERED: A response to Defendants Half Moon Bay Limited and Great House
Limited’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to the Doctrine of Forum Non
Conveniens [29] is due on or before November 10, 2015.
Discussion and argument held on Motion for Leave to Take Expedited Discovery Regarding
Personal Jurisdiction and to Stay the Remainder of the Case Pending the Court’s Determination
of Jurisdiction Issues [32] filed September 15, 2015.
ORDERED: Motion for Leave to Take Expedited Discovery Regarding Personal
Jurisdiction and to Stay the Remainder of the Case Pending the Court’s
Determination of Jurisdiction Issues [32] is TAKEN UNDER
ADVISEMENT. The court will issue a separate written order.
Court in Recess: 1:40 p.m.

Hearing concluded.

Total time in Court:

00:38

* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Stevens-Koenig Reporting at [phone].