Textile Network, Inc. v. California Webbing Mills, Inc.
ORDER Dismissing Claims re: 38 Stipulation of Dismissal without Prejudice filed by Textile Network, Inc. is approved, the claims of the plaintiff as asserted in its 1 Complaint, are dismissed without prejudice, that the counterclaims and affirmative defenses of California Webbing Mills Inc., as asserted in its Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims 9 remain pending. Signed by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/7/2016. (cmira)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01756-REB-MEH
TEXTILE NETWORK, INC., a Colorado corporation,
CALIFORNIA WEBBING MILLS, INC., a California corporation,
ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS
The matter is before me on the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal without
Prejudice [#38]1 filed March 4, 2016. After careful review of the stipulation and the
record, I conclude that the stipulation should be approved and that the claims of the
plaintiff as asserted in its Complaint [#1] filed August 13, 2015, should be dismissed
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulation of Dismissal without Prejudice is approved;
2. That the claims of the plaintiff as asserted in its Complaint [#1] filed August
13, 2015, against the defendant are dismissed without prejudice; and
3. That the counterclaims and affirmative defenses of California Webbing Mills,
“[#38]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
Inc., as asserted in its Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims [#9] filed
October 23, 2015, remain pending for independent adjudication.
Dated March 7, 2016, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?