Verlo et al v. City and County of Denver et al

Filing 96

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 94 Defendant Martinez's Unopposed Third Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order. Scheduling Order 67 is amended, re: dispositive motions deadline, as set forth in the order. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/17/2016.(emill)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 15-cv-01775-WJM-MJW ERIC VERLO, JANET MATZEN, and FULLY INFORMED JURY ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, ROBERT C. WHITE, and MICHAEL MARTINEZ, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that: • Defendant Martinez’s Unopposed Third Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order (Docket No. 94) is GRANTED IN PART for good cause shown, and DENIED IN PART insofar as the deadlines will be as follows, rather than as requested; and • The Scheduling Order (Docket No. 67) is AMENDED such that the dispositive motions deadline is EXTENDED until 21 days after the Tenth Circuit’s opinion resolving Defendant Martinez’s interlocutory appeal. Date: March 17, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?