Sevcovic et al v. City and County of Denver

Filing 24

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/19/16. Motion to Amend Complaint # 22 is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint - Opposed # 23 is DENIED without prejudice.(lgale, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01819-KLM
ALEXIS SEVCOVIC, and
RICHARD SEVCOVIC,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, on behalf of Denver International Airport,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint [#22]1
(the “First Motion”) and Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint - Opposed [#23] (the
“Second Motion” and collectively with the First Motion, the “Motions”). As an initial matter,
the Motions do not comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1(e), which requires that all pleadings
and documents be double spaced. The Court also notes that the Second Motion fails to
attach the proposed Amended Complaint or the exhibit required by D.C.COLO.LCivR 15.1
reflecting the proposed modifications to the Complaint. The Motions are subject to denial
for failure to comply with the Local Rules of the Court. However, because the Motions
request the same relief and the Second Motion supercedes the First Motion, the Court will
deny the First Motion as moot. Because the Second Motion does not comply with
D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1(e) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 15.1, the Court will deny that motion
without prejudice.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the First Motion [#22] is DENIED as moot and the
Second Motion [#23] is DENIED without prejudice.
Dated: January 19, 2016

1

“[#22]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.