Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Doe 1 et al

Filing 30

ORDER DISMISSING CASE on Plaintiffs Response to Order to Show Cause and Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice ECF No. 29 , filed on February 16, 2016. it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE against Defendants, John Does 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 2/17/2016. (evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel Civil Action No. 15-cv-1855-WYD-MEH COBBLER NEVADA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 4, JOHN DOE 5, JOHN DOE 6, JOHN DOE 7, JOHN DOE 8, JOHN DOE 9 JOHN DOE 10, JOHN DOE 11, JOHN DOE 12, JOHN DOE 14, JOHN DOE 15, JOHN DOE 16, JOHN DOE 17, JOHN DOE 18, JOHN DOE 19, JOHN DOE 20, JOHN DOE 21, JOHN DOE 22, JOHN DOE 23, JOHN DOE 24, JOHN DOE 25, JOHN DOE 26, JOHN DOE 27, JOHN DOE 28, JOHN DOE 29, Defendants. ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Response to Order to Show Cause and Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice (ECF No. 29), filed on February 16, 2016. None of the remaining Defendants have filed an Answer or a Motion for Summary Judgment in this matter. After careful review of the record, the Court concludes that pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this action shall be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE against Defendants, John Does 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Dated: February 17, 2016. BY THE COURT: s/ Wiley Y. Daniel Wiley Y. Daniel Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?