Galich v. Sears Holdings

Filing 62

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The second amended complaint is filed, the defendants' motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) is denied and the defendants will answer the second amended complaint. The motion to set a scheduling conference 61 is denied as not consistent with this Court's case management procedures, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/27/16. (ktera)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01868-RPM
ALBERT L. GALICH,
Plaintiff,
v.
SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION and
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY,
Defendants.
____________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
____________________________________________________________________________
Upon consideration of the plaintiff’s motion to file a second amended complaint (Doc.
58), it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted, the second amended complaint is filed, the
defendants’ motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) is denied and the defendants will answer the
second amended complaint. The motion to set a scheduling conference (Doc. 61) is denied as
not consistent with this Court’s case management procedures.

DATED: April 27, 2016
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
__________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge