United States of America v. Herrera

Filing 30

ORDER. Mr. Herrera shall have an additional 20 days, or until April 29, 2016, in which to meet his obligations regarding certified mailings, and in the interim Ms. Ramirez is directed to CONFER with Ms. Eskesen in an effort to reach a compromise re garding postage and the expense of those mailings. The IRS shall file a further Status Report on or before May 10, 2016, on the question of Mr. Herrera's compliance, stating specifically whether the contempt citation may be discharged by Mr. Herreras purging of contempt. Signed by Judge John L. Kane on 04/08/2016. (athom, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-01894-JLK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GERARDO HERRERA, individually and d/b/a El Lobo MultiServicios Professionales, Inc.; Lobo Multiservicios; and Lobos Multiservicios LLC, Defendant. ORDER Kane, J. Having reviewed the Status Report submitted by Mr. Herrera in response to the Court’s March 11, 2016, oral directive to show substantial compliance with the Court’s orders (Doc. 29), the Court finds that Mr. Herrera has engaged in good faith in an effort to meet his compliance obligations and has made significant progress. IT IS ORDERED that Mr. Herrera shall have an additional 20 days, or until April 29, 2016, in which to meet his obligations regarding certified mailings, and in the interim Ms. Ramirez is directed to CONFER with Ms. Eskesen in an effort to reach a compromise regarding postage and the expense of those mailings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the IRS shall file a further Status Report on or   before May 10, 2016, on the question of Mr. Herrera's compliance, stating specifically whether the contempt citation may be discharged by Mr. Herrera’s purging of contempt. DATED: April 8, 2016. IT IS SO ORDERED JOHN L. KANE SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?