United States of America v. Herrera
Filing
30
ORDER. Mr. Herrera shall have an additional 20 days, or until April 29, 2016, in which to meet his obligations regarding certified mailings, and in the interim Ms. Ramirez is directed to CONFER with Ms. Eskesen in an effort to reach a compromise re garding postage and the expense of those mailings. The IRS shall file a further Status Report on or before May 10, 2016, on the question of Mr. Herrera's compliance, stating specifically whether the contempt citation may be discharged by Mr. Herreras purging of contempt. Signed by Judge John L. Kane on 04/08/2016. (athom, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-01894-JLK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
GERARDO HERRERA, individually and d/b/a
El Lobo MultiServicios Professionales, Inc.;
Lobo Multiservicios; and
Lobos Multiservicios LLC,
Defendant.
ORDER
Kane, J.
Having reviewed the Status Report submitted by Mr. Herrera in response to the Court’s
March 11, 2016, oral directive to show substantial compliance with the Court’s orders (Doc.
29), the Court finds that Mr. Herrera has engaged in good faith in an effort to meet his
compliance obligations and has made significant progress.
IT IS ORDERED that Mr. Herrera shall have an additional 20 days, or until April 29,
2016, in which to meet his obligations regarding certified mailings, and in the interim Ms.
Ramirez is directed to CONFER with Ms. Eskesen in an effort to reach a compromise
regarding postage and the expense of those mailings.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the IRS shall file a further Status Report on or
before May 10, 2016, on the question of Mr. Herrera's compliance, stating specifically whether
the contempt citation may be discharged by Mr. Herrera’s purging of contempt.
DATED: April 8, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED
JOHN L. KANE
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?