Birch v. Sprint/Nextel Corp.
MINUTE ORDER; 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment is DENIED, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/3/15.(morti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01901-KLM
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff[’s] Motion for Entry of Default
Judgment [#11]1 (the “Motion”). In the Motion, Plaintiff asks the Court to enter default
judgment against Defendant. Id. at 1. The Motion must be denied for two independent
First, on October 29, 2015, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss [#10]. Further, the
Summons returned in this case shows that service was effected on October 8, 2015 [#9].
As a result, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss was timely filed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)
(requiring defendant to file response to complaint within 21 days of service). Therefore,
Plaintiff’s argument that Defendant “has failed to defend” this lawsuit is incorrect and the
Court will deny the Motion. The Court notes that at the time he mailed the Motion, Plaintiff
was likely unaware of the Motion to Dismiss. The certificate of service attached to the
Motion was signed on October 28, 2015, but was not received by the Court and entered
on the docket until November 2, 2015.
In addition, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure contemplate a two-step process for
entry of default judgment. Williams v. Smithson, 57 F.3d 1081, at *1 (10th Cir. June 20,
1995) (table decision); U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Com’n v. Trimble, Civil Action No.
11-cv-02887-PAB-KMT, 2013 WL 317576, at *1 (D. Colo. Jan. 28, 2013). First, the party
seeking a default judgment must request an entry of default from the clerk of the court
“[#11]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Id. After default has been entered by the clerk, the party may
seek default judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Id. Plaintiff did not seek entry of
default prior to filing the Motion. As a result, the Motion is also subject to denial for failure
to seek and obtain entry of default prior to seeking entry of default judgment. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#11] is DENIED.
Dated: November 3, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?