Cole et al v. Quanta Services et al
Filing
22
ORDER Pursuant to the defendants motions to dismiss Docs. 13 and 16 and the plaintiffs response Doc. 20 and the allegation of the complaint that the plaintiffs have not received their Right to Sue letters from the EEOC, it is ORDERED that p ursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), the third, fourth and fifth claims for relief are dismissed without prejudice and it is FURTHER ORDERED that proceedings on the first and second claims for relief are stayed until the plaintiffs supplement the complaint when Right to Sue letters are received, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/19/2015.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01992-RPM
CINDY COLE,
PATSY BAYNARD,
MARTA FARRELL,
DIANE GIACOMOZZI
KIMBERLY KULLEN, and
MICHAEL DONMOYER,
Plaintiffs,
v.
QUANTA SERVICES, INC. and
QUANTA POWER GENERATION, INC. and its related entities, including
QUANTA POWER INC.,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER DISMISSING THIRD, FOURTH AND FIFTH CLAIMS AND FOR STAY
_____________________________________________________________________
Pursuant to the defendants’ motions to dismiss (Docs. 13 and 16) and the
plaintiffs’ response (Doc. 20) and the allegation of the complaint that the plaintiffs have
not received their Right to Sue letters from the EEOC, it is
ORDERED that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), the third, fourth and fifth
claims for relief are dismissed without prejudice and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that proceedings on the first and second claims for relief
are stayed until the plaintiffs supplement the complaint when Right to Sue letters are
received.
DATED:
November 19th, 2015
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
__________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?