Taconi v. Ameristar Casino Black Hawk, Inc.
ORDER Denying 16 plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment without prejudice as premature, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/24/2016.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 15-cv-02099-REB-NYW
AMERISTAR CASINO BLACK, HAWK, INC. d/b/a AMERISTAR CASINO RESORT
SPA BLACK HAWK,
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
The matter before me is plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment [#16],1 filed
February 9, 2016. I deny the motion without prejudice as premature.
Defendant was served a copy of the summons and complaint on November 3,
2015. (See Summons [#8], filed December 17, 2016.) Defendant failed to answer or
otherwise respond to the complaint within the time permitted by law, and thus has
admitted the factual allegations of the complaint other than those relating to damages.
See FED. R. CIV. P. 8(d); see also Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Huddleston,
94 F.3d 1413, 1415 (10th Cir. 1996). Entry of default under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) was
made by the clerk of the court on December 17, 2015 [#9].
“[#16]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
Plaintiff now seeks default judgment against defendant pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
P. 55(b)(1). However, the motion fails to apprise the court as to how plaintiff believes
the facts set forth in the complaint – and now admitted by defendant’s failure to answer
or otherwise appear in this action – prove up any one more of the claims for relief she
has pleaded. I decline plaintiff’s implicit invitation to divine the legal basis for a
judgment in her favor from the bare fact of defendant’s failure to timely answer.2 The
motion therefore must be denied without prejudice.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion for Default
Judgment [#16], filed February 9, 2016, is denied without prejudice as premature.
Dated February 24, 2016, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
In addition, I note that plaintiff’s motion is more properly brought under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2),
as plaintiff’s damages are not for a liquidated amount or other sum certain:
To be a “sum certain” there must be no doubt as to the amount that must be awarded.
Thus, a court may enter a default judgment without a hearing only if the amount claimed is
a liquidated sum or one capable of mathematical calculation.
The inquiry does not end, however, just because a plaintiff requests a specific amount in
its complaint. A plaintiff cannot satisfy the certainty requirement simply by requesting a
specific amount. He or she must also establish that the amount requested is reasonable
under the circumstances. Damages may be awarded only if the record adequately
reflects the basis for award via a hearing or a demonstration by detailed affidavits
establishing the necessary facts. Additionally, the amount of damages that a plaintiff may
recover on default is limited to the amount that the plaintiff claims in the prayer for relief in
Hennecke, Inc. v. Advanced Building Composites, LLC, 2010 WL 2464842 at *2 (D. Kan. June 4,
2010) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). Plaintiff here did not request a specific amount of
damages in her complaint, thus making relief inappropriate under Rule 55(b)(1).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?