Duncan v. Banks
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 35 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 01/06/2016. Paragraph 9 of the operative Scheduling Order shall be modified as follows: A. Deadline for Joinder of Parties and Amendment of Pleadings: 2/8/2016. 1. Deadline for Answer or Response to Amended Pleading: 3/9/2016.(mdave, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-02104-MSK-MEH
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on January 6, 2016.
Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order [filed January 5, 2016; docket
#35] is granted in part and denied in part. There is nothing in the operative Scheduling Order
demonstrating that the deadline for joinder of parties and amendment of pleadings “affects” the
remaining deadlines; in fact, in this District, such deadline is presumptively set 45 days after the
scheduling conference in accordance with D.C. Colo. LCivR App. F.1. Beyond his conclusory
statement in this regard, the Plaintiff provides no other justification for extending deadlines other
than that set for joinder of parties and amending the pleading.
Thus, for good cause shown, paragraph 9 of the operative Scheduling Order shall be
modified as follows:
Deadline for Joinder of Parties and Amendment of Pleadings:
February 8, 2016
March 9, 2016
Deadline for Answer or Response to Amended Pleading:
All other deadlines and conference dates shall remain the same.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?