Zartner v. City and County of Denver, Colorado et al
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 2/23/16. Motion to Dismiss # 24 is DENIED as moot.(lgale, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-02218-KLM
KENNETH R. ZARTNER,
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO,
SHAWN L. MILLER,
RICHARD GILSTRAP, and
APRIL KULHANEK, R.N.,
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendant City and County of Denver’s Motion
to Dismiss [#24] (the “Motion”). The Motion was filed on January 25, 2016. On February
16, 2016, Plaintiff timely filed an Amended Complaint as a matter of course pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#24] is DENIED as moot. See, e.g.,
Strich v. United States, No. 09-cv-01913-REB-KLM, 2010 WL 14826, at *1 (D. Colo. Jan.
11, 2010) (citations omitted) (“The filing of an amended complaint moots a motion to
dismiss directed at the complaint that is supplanted and superseded.”); AJB Props., Ltd.
v. Zarda Bar-B-Q of Lenexa, LLC, No. 09-2021-JWL, 2009 WL 1140185, at *1 (D. Kan. Apr.
28, 2009) (finding that amended complaint superseded original complaint and “accordingly,
defendant’s motion to dismiss the original complaint is denied as moot”); Gotfredson v.
Larsen LP, 432 F. Supp. 2d 1163, 1172 (D. Colo. 2006) (noting that defendants’ motions
to dismiss are “technically moot because they are directed at a pleading that is no longer
Dated: February 23, 2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?