Job Store, Inc., The v. Job Store of Loveland, Ohio, LLC, The et al

Filing 20

MINUTE ORDER; 16 Motion to Vacate or Amend Order Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference is GRANTED in part. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference set for 1/28/2016 is VACATED and RESET to 2/25/2016 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Theparties shall submit the proposed scheduling order no later than February 18, 2016. 18 Motion to Expedite is DENIED as moot, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/15/16.(morti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-02228-PAB-KLM
THE JOB STORE, INC., a Colorado corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE JOB STORE OF LOVELAND, OHIO, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company,
THE JOB STORE OF CINCINNATI, OHIO, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company, and
DYTR STAFFING AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY, an Ohio corporation,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Vacate or Amend Order
Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference [#16] (the “Motion to Vacate”) and on
Defendant’s Motion to for [sic] Expedited Briefing [#18] (the “Motion to Expedite”).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate [#16] is GRANTED in part.
Accordingly,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference set for January 28,
2016 at 9:30 a.m. is VACATED and RESET to February 25, 2016 at 10:30 a.m. in
Courtroom A-401 of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver,
Colorado.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit their proposed scheduling
order pursuant to the District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing ("ECF") Procedures. The
parties shall submit the proposed scheduling order no later than February 18, 2016.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if either party seeks a further continuance of the
Scheduling Conference due to a pending dispositive motion, the party shall file a motion
for a stay addressing the factors delineated in String Cheese Incident, LLC v. Stylus
Shows, Inc., No. 1:02-cv-01934-LTB-PAC, 2006 WL 894955, at *2 (D. Colo. Mar. 30,
2006). The Court notes that a pending motion to stay does not relieve the parties of their
continuing legal obligations to meet deadlines set by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
-1-

the Local Rules, and Court Orders.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Expedite [#18] is DENIED as moot.

Dated: January 15, 2016

-2-