Amoto v. Colvin

Filing 14

ORDER for Substitution of Party on 13 Suggestion of Death regarding Lawrence Michael Amoto. That the Notice of Suggestion of Death and Request for Change of Caption 13 , filed February 4, 2016, is approved; and That Allegra Amoto, on behalf of Lawrence Michael Amoto, deceased, should be substituted as the named plaintiff in this action, and the case caption amended Allegra Amoto added. Lawrence Michael Amoto terminated, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/9/2016. (evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No.: 1:15-cv-2391-REB LAWRENCE MICHAEL AMOTO, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Defendant. ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PARTY ON SUGGESTION OF DEATH Blackburn, J. The matter before me is plaintiff’s Notice of Suggestion of Death and Request for Change of Caption [#13],1 filed February 4, 2016. After careful review of the notice and the file, I conclude that the request is proper under Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1) and thus should be approved, and that Allegra Amoto should be substituted as the named plaintiff in this action. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Notice of Suggestion of Death and Request for Change of Caption [#13], filed February 4, 2016, is approved; and 2. That Allegra Amoto, on behalf of Lawrence Michael Amoto, deceased, should be substituted as the named plaintiff in this action, and the case caption amended as follows: 1 “[#13]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. Civil Action No.: 1:15-cv-2391-REB ALLEGRA AMOTO, on behalf of Lawrence Michael Amoto, deceased, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Dated February 9, 2016, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?