Amoto v. Colvin
Filing
14
ORDER for Substitution of Party on 13 Suggestion of Death regarding Lawrence Michael Amoto. That the Notice of Suggestion of Death and Request for Change of Caption 13 , filed February 4, 2016, is approved; and That Allegra Amoto, on behalf of Lawrence Michael Amoto, deceased, should be substituted as the named plaintiff in this action, and the case caption amended Allegra Amoto added. Lawrence Michael Amoto terminated, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/9/2016. (evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No.: 1:15-cv-2391-REB
LAWRENCE MICHAEL AMOTO,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant.
ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PARTY ON SUGGESTION OF DEATH
Blackburn, J.
The matter before me is plaintiff’s Notice of Suggestion of Death and Request
for Change of Caption [#13],1 filed February 4, 2016. After careful review of the notice
and the file, I conclude that the request is proper under Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1) and thus
should be approved, and that Allegra Amoto should be substituted as the named
plaintiff in this action.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Notice of Suggestion of Death and Request for Change of
Caption [#13], filed February 4, 2016, is approved; and
2. That Allegra Amoto, on behalf of Lawrence Michael Amoto, deceased, should
be substituted as the named plaintiff in this action, and the case caption amended as
follows:
1
“[#13]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
Civil Action No.: 1:15-cv-2391-REB
ALLEGRA AMOTO, on behalf of Lawrence Michael Amoto, deceased,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
Dated February 9, 2016, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?