Coppage v. Hagens et al

Filing 33

MINUTE ORDER denying 31 Motion to Seek Relief from Retaliation Tactics, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/11/2016.(slibi, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 15-cv-02527-REB-MEH DAVON COPPAGE, Plaintiff, v. C. HAGENS, FNU YENTER, THERESA COZZA-RHODES, and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on April 11, 2016. Plaintiff’s Motion to Seek Relief from Retaliation Tactics [filed April 7, 2016; docket #31] is denied for the following reasons. First, except for the title of his motion, Plaintiff does not request or identify any relief he seeks from the Court in the motion. Second, to the extent Plaintiff wishes to amend his Amended Complaint to seek recovery for any alleged “retaliation,” he must file a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) and attach a proposed amended pleading.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?