Coppage v. Hagens et al

Filing 33

MINUTE ORDER denying 31 Motion to Seek Relief from Retaliation Tactics, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/11/2016.(slibi, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-02527-REB-MEH
DAVON COPPAGE,
Plaintiff,
v.
C. HAGENS,
FNU YENTER,
THERESA COZZA-RHODES, and
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on April 11, 2016.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Seek Relief from Retaliation Tactics [filed April 7, 2016; docket #31]
is denied for the following reasons.
First, except for the title of his motion, Plaintiff does not request or identify any relief he
seeks from the Court in the motion.
Second, to the extent Plaintiff wishes to amend his Amended Complaint to seek recovery for
any alleged “retaliation,” he must file a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) and attach a
proposed amended pleading.