Hill v. United Airlines, Inc.

Filing 31

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 30 Joint Motion for Entry of Confidentiality Agreement and Stipulated Protective Order by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 03/09/2016.(mdave, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-02593-MEH
THERESA M. HILL,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED AIRLINES, INC.,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on March 9, 2016.
The Joint Motion for Entry of Confidentiality Agreement and Stipulated Protective Order
[filed March 8, 2016; docket #30] is denied without prejudice, and the proposed Stipulated
Protective Order is refused. The parties are granted leave to re-file their motion and submit a revised
proposed protective order that is consistent with Gillard v. Boulder Valley Sch. Dist., 196 F.R.D.
382 (D. Colo. 2000), in which the Court requires a specific mechanism by which the parties may
challenge the designation of information as confidential. See id. at 388-89.
In addition, the Court will not retain jurisdiction over matters in a closed case.
The Court reminds the parties that, if they choose to re-file the motion, they must also
provide the Court with a copy of the proposed order in useable format (Word, Word Perfect). They
may email a copy of the proposed order to [e-mail].