Deherrera v. Colvin
ORDER. Ordered that by March 21, 2016, the parties may sign and file the attached form of consent. by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/19/2016 (Attachments: # 1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (agarc, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 15-cv-02658-REB
PETER RONNY DEHERRERA,
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
This matter is before the court sua sponte. The parties have indicated their intent
under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d) to consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge
under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (See Joint Case Management Plan ¶ 9 [#18],1 filed
February 18, 2016.) To effectuate that consent, the parties must file the form required
under Rule 72.2(d), entitled “Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States
Magistrate Judge,” a copy of which is attached to this Order.2 If the parties persist
under Rule 72.2(d) in their consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28
U.S.C. § 636(c), they should complete and file the consent form attached to this Order.3
“[#18]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
A paradigm of this form also is available on the court’s website under “Rules & Procedures” at
“Forms” and then under “Local Rules of Practice Forms.”
Although the parties filed a copy of the proper form (see [#17], filed February 18, 2016), the
form is entirely blank.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That by March 21, 2016, the parties may sign and file the attached form of
2. That on completion of pre-merits management, the court shall issue an
appropriate order of reference directing the clerk of the court to assign this matter to a
United States Magistrate Judge.
Dated February 19, 2016, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?