Jarrell v. Viking Insurance Company of Wisconsin et al

Filing 22

ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. In light of the decline of consent to a magistrate judge by one or more of the parties in this case and its reassignment to this Court, the Scheduling Conference set February 8, 2016 before Magistrate Judge Watanabe is VACATED. The parties are ordered to set an initial scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1. The parties are directed to j ointly contact Chambers by telephone at [phone] or by email at [e-mail] to obtain a scheduling conference date within 14 days of the date of this order. Please see the order for additional details. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 1/26/16. (rbjsec. )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge R. Brooke Jackson
Civil Action No 15-cv-02676-RBJ
JAMES JARRELL and DIANE JARRELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
VIKING INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN, a foreign entity doing business in the
State of Colorado, a Division of Sentry Insurance a Mutual Company,
FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Minnesota Insurance Company doing
business in the State of Colorado,
Defendant.

ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. In light of the decline of consent to a
magistrate judge by one or more of the parties in this case and its reassignment to this Court, the
Scheduling Conference set February 8, 2016 before Magistrate Judge Watanabe is VACATED.
The parties are ordered to set an initial scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson)
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1. Each party’s lead trial counsel
shall attend the conference. The conference shall be held in Courtroom A-902, Alfred A. Arraj
U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties are directed to jointly contact
Chambers by telephone at [phone] or by email at [e-mail]
to obtain a scheduling conference date within 14 days of the date of this order.
A meeting for the purposes of attempting to agree on a scheduling order and satisfying
the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) should be held no later than 21 days before the
proposed scheduling order is tendered. The proposed scheduling order, which should be

prepared as described in the local rules, should be tendered by email no later than five days
before the scheduling conference. A copy of instructions for the preparation of a scheduling
order and a form scheduling order can be downloaded from the Court’s website
(http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/CourtOperations/RulesProcedures/Forms.aspx).
DATED this 26th day of January, 2016.
BY THE COURT:

___________________________________
R. Brooke Jackson
United States District Judge