Gahan v. Sanofi S.A. et al

Filing 42

MINUTE ORDER : Granting 40 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Reset Defendants' Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Jury Demand and to Withdraw Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Withdrawing 38 Sanofi-Av entis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.'s Motion and Memorandum in Support to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims. Deadline for Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc. to file an answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended C omplaint and Jury Demand 25 is 7/5/2016. Scheduling Conference 4/6/2016 09:00 AM is CONVERTED to a Status Conference. Deadline to file proposed scheduling order is vacated. Status Conference set for 4/6/2016 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/7/2016.(emill)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 15-cv-02777-RM-MJW KELLY GAHAN, Plaintiff, v. SANOFI S.A., AVENTIS PHARMA S.A., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI US SERVICES INC., and WINTRHOP U.S. Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that: • Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Reset Defendants’ Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint and Jury Demand and to Withdraw Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 40) is GRANTED for good cause shown; • Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 38) is WITHDRAWN; • Defendants Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc. SHALL FILE an answer or other response to the First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand (Docket No. 25) on or before July 5, 2016; • The Scheduling Conference currently set for April 6, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. is CONVERTED to a Status Conference; and • The deadline to file a proposed scheduling order is VACATED. Date: March 7, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?