Toevs v. Quinn et al
Filing
3
ORDER DRAWING CASE. ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 1/4/2016. (agarc, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-02838-GPG
JANOS TOEVS,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES QUINN, First Assistant Attorney General,
NICOLE GELLAR, Senior Assistant Attorney General,
CYNTHIA COFFMAN, Attorney General for the State of Colorado,
JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General for the State of Colorado,
KEITH NORDELL, Legal Counsel for the Colorado Department of Corrections,
ADRIENNE JACOBSON, Legal Counsel for the Colorado Department of Corrections,
THERESA REYNOLDS, Legal Assistant for the Colorado Department of Corrections,
RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections,
TRAVIS TRANI, Warden of the Colorado State Penitentiary,
SEAN FOSTER, Associate Warden of the Colorado State Penitentiary,
CAROL SOARES, Associate Warden of the Colorado State Penitentiary,
FRANK ORTIZ, Litigation Coordinator of the Colorado State Penitentiary,
CHRIS BARR, Intelligence Lieutenant at the Colorado State Penitentiary,
DANIEL DENT, Intelligence Sergeant at the Colorado State Penitentiary,
RAEANNE WILL, Disciplinary Officer at the Colorado State Penitentiary, and
DALE BURKE, Hearing Officer at the Colorado State Penitentiary,
Defendants.
ORDER DRAWING CASE
After review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(b), the court has determined that
this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the case
will be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. See
D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c). Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to
a magistrate judge.
DATED January 4, 2016, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
Gordon P. Gallagher
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?