Ajaj v. United States of America et al

Filing 231

ORDER. The Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Recommendation (ECF No. 224 ) to administratively close this action in its entirety; DIRECTS the Clerk to administratively close this action subject to reopening for good cause; and DIRECTS the Clerk to terminate all pending motions, in accordance with D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on January 26, 2021. (rvill, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 15-cv-02849-RM-KLM
AHMAD MOHAMMAD AJAJ,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court on the December 14, 2020, Order and Recommendation of
United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix (ECF No. 224). The Magistrate Judge
recommended (the “Recommendation”) this case be administratively closed pursuant to
D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, subject to reopening for good cause. The Recommendation is
incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).
The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within
fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (ECF No. 224, at page 3.)
Despite this advisement, no objections to the Recommendation have to date been filed by any
party and the time to do so has expired. (See generally Dkt.)
The Court concludes that Magistrate Judge Mix’s analysis was thorough and sound, and
that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) advisory
committee’s note (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there
is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”); see also

Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (“In the absence of timely objection, the
district court may review a magistrate’s report under any standard it deems appropriate.”). The
Recommendation is, therefore, adopted as an order of this Court.
In accordance with the foregoing, the Court:
(1) ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Recommendation (ECF No. 224) to administratively
close this action in its entirety;
(2) DIRECTS the Clerk to administratively close this action subject to reopening for good
cause; and
(3) DIRECTS the Clerk to terminate all pending motions, in accordance with
D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2.1
DATED this 26th day of January, 2021.
BY THE COURT:

____________________________________
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge

1

Local Rule 41.2 provides that “[a]dministrative closure of a civil action terminates any pending motion. Reopening
of a civil action does not reinstate any motion.”
2