Reneau v. Fauvel et al
MINUTE ORDER: GRANTING 23 Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Disclose Information. DENYING 24 Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Reply. GRANTING 25 Defendant Jamie Soucie's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 7 . Jamie (I) Soucie answer due 4/25/2016. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/30/2016. (emill)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 16-cv-00039-MSK-MJW
CHESTER LEE RENEAU,
JOHN/JANE DOE, in his or her individual and official capacities,
JAIMIE SOUCIE, in her individual and official capacities,
HELENE CHRISTNER, in her individual and official capacities, and
MAURICE FAUVEL, in his individual capacity,
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s Motion for Order to Disclose Information (Docket No. 23),
construed as a motion for early discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d)(1),
is GRANTED. The information requested (the identity of the individuals
responsible for denying Plaintiff’s MRI request) shall be treated as
Plaintiff’s first interrogatory. Defendant Fauvel is directed to serve a
response to the interrogatory on or before April 25, 2016;
Plaintiff’s Motion for Order to Reply (Docket No. 24) is DENIED.
Defendants shall have all the time that is due them under the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure to file an answer or other response to Plaintiff’s
Defendant Jamie Soucie’s Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or
Otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Docket No. 25) is
GRANTED. Defendant Soucie shall file an answer or other response to
the operative complaint on or before April 25, 2016.
Date: March 30, 2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?