Rolland v. Carnation Building Services, Inc, et al
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 03/11/16 Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. Scheduling Conference set for 4/15/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 16-cv-00057-CMA-NYW
RONNIE R. ROLLAND,
CARNATION BUILDING SERVICES, INC.,
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
IT IS ORDERED that a Scheduling Conference is set for April 15, 2016 at 11:00 a.m.,
in Courtroom C-204, 2d Floor, Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street,
Denver, Colorado. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Byron G. Rogers United
States Courthouse will be required to show valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR
A copy of the instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form of
scheduling order can be downloaded from the court’s website at www.cod.uscourts.gov. The
parties or their counsel shall submit their proposed scheduling order, pursuant to District of
Colorado Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) Procedures V.6.0, including a copy of the proposed
scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, on or
before seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel/pro se parties in this case shall hold a prescheduling conference meeting and prepare a proposed Scheduling Order in accordance with
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 and 26.1(a) on or before twenty-one days
prior to the Scheduling Conference. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d) no discovery shall be
sought until after the pre-scheduling conference meeting.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the parties shall comply with the mandatory disclosure
requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) on or before fourteen days after the pre-scheduling
DATED: March 11, 2016
BY THE COURT:
s/Nina Y. Wang__________
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?