Rolland v. Carnation Building Services, Inc, et al

Filing 47

ORDER Affirming and Adopting Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 17 ). Plaintiff's Motion to Amend (Doc. # 13 ) is DENIED. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 04/20/2016. (athom, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello Civil Action No. 16-cv-00057-CMA-NYW RONNIE R. ROLLAND, Plaintiff, v. CARNATION BUILDING SERVICES, INC., Defendant. ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. # 17) This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang, dated February 29, 2016 (Doc. # 17), in which Magistrate Judge Wang recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff Ronnie R. Rolland’s motion to amend (Doc. # 13). The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within 14 days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (Doc. # 17 at 5.) No objections to the Recommendation were filed. “[T]he district court is accorded considerable discretion with respect to the treatment of unchallenged magistrate reports. In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate’s report under any standard it deems appropriate.” Summers v. State of Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991). After reviewing the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Wang, the Court is satisfied that it is sound and that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). The Court agrees that Plaintiff’s motion to amend should be denied. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang, filed February 29, 2016 (Doc. # 17), is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (Doc. # 13) is DENIED. DATED: April 20, 2016 BY THE COURT: CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?