Rolland v. Carnation Building Services, Inc, et al
ORDER Affirming and Adopting Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 17 ). Plaintiff's Motion to Amend (Doc. # 13 ) is DENIED. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 04/20/2016. (athom, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Christine M. Arguello
Civil Action No. 16-cv-00057-CMA-NYW
RONNIE R. ROLLAND,
CARNATION BUILDING SERVICES, INC.,
ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. # 17)
This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang, dated February 29, 2016 (Doc. # 17), in which
Magistrate Judge Wang recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff Ronnie R. Rolland’s
motion to amend (Doc. # 13). The Recommendation is incorporated herein by
reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were
due within 14 days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (Doc. # 17
at 5.) No objections to the Recommendation were filed. “[T]he district court is accorded
considerable discretion with respect to the treatment of unchallenged magistrate
reports. In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate’s
report under any standard it deems appropriate.” Summers v. State of Utah, 927 F.2d
1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991).
After reviewing the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Wang, the Court is
satisfied that it is sound and that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). The Court agrees that Plaintiff’s motion to amend should be
denied. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Nina Y.
Wang, filed February 29, 2016 (Doc. # 17), is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (Doc. # 13) is DENIED.
DATED: April 20, 2016
BY THE COURT:
CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?