Lopez v. Next Generation Construction & Environmental, LLC et al
MINUTE ORDER; 15 Motion for More Definite Statement of the Class and Collective Action Complaint is DENIED as moot, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 5/5/16.(morti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 16-cv-00076-CMA-KLM
RICARDO LOPEZ, on behalf of himself and all similarly situated persons,
NEXT GENERATION CONSTRUCTION & ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC, a Colorado limited
liability company, and
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for a More Definite
Statement of the Class and Collective Action Complaint [#15] (the “Motion”). Pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B), “[a] party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course
within . . . 21 days after service of a motion under Rule [12(e)] . . . .” On April 19, 2016,
Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [#18], twenty-one days after the Motion [#15] was
filed. Because the Amended Complaint was timely filed as a matter of course in response
to the Motion [#15], and because the Amended Complaint supersedes the Complaint,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#15] is DENIED as moot. See, e.g.,
Strich v. United States, No. 09-cv-01913-REB-KLM, 2010 WL 14826, at *1 (D. Colo. Jan.
11, 2010) (citations omitted) (“The filing of an amended complaint moots a motion to
dismiss directed at the complaint that is supplanted and superseded.”); AJB Props., Ltd.
v. Zarda Bar-B-Q of Lenexa, LLC, No. 09-2021-JWL, 2009 WL 1140185, at *1 (D. Kan.
April 28, 2009) (finding that amended complaint superseded original complaint and
“accordingly, defendant’s motion to dismiss the original complaint is denied as moot”);
Gotfredson v. Larsen LP, 432 F.Supp.2d 1163, 1172 (D. Colo. 2006) (noting that
defendants’ motions are “technically moot because they are directed at a pleading that is
no longer operative”).
Dated: May 5, 2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?