Pollard v. ETS PC, Inc.
MINUTE ORDER granting 123 Joint Motion to Vacate Scheduling Conference and Stay Discovery Pending Determination of Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss 67 . Scheduling Conference 3/17/2016 10:30 AM is VACATED. Discovery and all other proceedings in this case are STAYED. Parties shall file joint status report as set forth in the order. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/4/2016.(emill)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 16-cv-00097-WJM-MJW
MARK W. MCCLOSKEY,
Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
ETS PC, INC. F/K/A EBERL’S TEMPORARY SERVICES, INC.,
ECS PC, INC. F/K/A EBERL’S CLAIM SERVICE, INC.,
EAC PC, LLC F/K/A EBERL’S ACQUISITION CO., LLC,
ETS HOLDING COMPANY, INC.,
EBERL CLAIMS SERVICE, LLC F/K/A FORSYTH COLORADO, LLC, and
KIRK J. EBERL,
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that:
The Joint Motion to Vacate Scheduling Conference and Stay Discovery
Pending Determination of Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and
Dismiss (Docket No. 123) is GRANTED, based upon the parties’
agreement and the Court’s independent weighing of the String Cheese
factors, see String Cheese Incident, LLC v. Stylus Shows, Inc., 2006 WL
894955, at *2 (D. Colo. Mar. 30, 2006);
The Scheduling Conference set for March 17, 2016, at 10:30 a.m. is
VACATED, along with the requirement to file a proposed scheduling order;
Discovery and all other proceedings in this case are STAYED; and
No later than five business days after Judge Martinez resolves
Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss (Docket No. 67), if
the case is to proceed forward in this forum in any fashion, the parties
shall file a joint status report advising the Court of three dates and times
for which they are available for a scheduling conference.
Date: March 4, 2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?