Matson et al v. Dillon Companies, Inc.
Filing
7
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/19/16. A Scheduling Conference is set for 3/8/2016 09:30 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties shall submit their proposed schedulin g order, including a copy of the proposed scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference. Counsel/pro se parties in this case shall hold a pre-scheduling conference meeting and prepare a proposed Scheduling Order twenty-one days prior to the Scheduling Conference. (bsimm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 16-cv-00103-CMA-NYW
MERWYN MATSON, and
AUDREY MATSON,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DILLON COMPANIES, INC.,
a Kansas corporation d/b/a King Soopers,
Defendant.
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
IT IS ORDERED that a Scheduling Conference is set for March 8, 2016 at 9:30 a.m., in
Courtroom C-204, 2d Floor, Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street,
Denver, Colorado. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Byron G. Rogers United
States Courthouse will be required to show valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR
83.2(b).
A copy of the instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form of
scheduling order can be downloaded from the court’s website at www.cod.uscourts.gov. The
parties or their counsel shall submit their proposed scheduling order, pursuant to District of
Colorado Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) Procedures V.6.0, including a copy of the proposed
scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, on or
before seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel/pro se parties in this case shall hold a prescheduling conference meeting and prepare a proposed Scheduling Order in accordance with
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 and 26.1(a) on or before twenty-one days
prior to the Scheduling Conference. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d) no discovery shall be
sought until after the pre-scheduling conference meeting.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the parties shall comply with the mandatory disclosure
requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) on or before fourteen days after the pre-scheduling
conference meeting.
DATED: January 19, 2016
BY THE COURT:
s/Nina Y. Wang__________
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?