Harris v. Adams County Sheriffs Department, et al
ORDER Granting 21 Plaintiff Motion To Dismiss Complaint. That under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(I), this case is dismissed without prejudice; and That this case is closed, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/9/2016.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 16-cv-00160-REB-MEH
MARQUISE DEMONT HARRIS,
ADAMS COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT,
MICHAEL MCINTOSH, in his individual and official capacities,
S. FULLER, in his individual and official capacities, and
DEPUTY JOHN DOE, in his individual and official capacities,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
This matter is before me on the Plaintiff Motion To Dismiss Complaint [#21]1
filed March 2, 2016. The motion is granted.
When filed, the motion to dismiss [#21] was referred [#22] to the assigned
magistrate judge. Having gained the consent of the magistrate judge, I withdraw the
reference [#22] of the motion and resolve it in this order.
The plaintiff asks that his complaint be dismissed under Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(a)(1)(A)(I), which permits a plaintiff to dismiss his or her complaint without a court
order before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary
judgment. None of the defendants has filed an answer or motion for summary
“[#21]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
judgment. Procedurally, voluntary dismissal by the plaintiff is proper.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Plaintiff Motion To Dismiss Complaint [#21] filed March 2, 2016, is
2. That under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(I), this case is dismissed without
3. That this case is closed.
Dated March 9, 2016, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?