Liggett v. No Named Respondent

Filing 7

MINUTE ORDER. Applicant's Motion to Proceed Indigently According to 28 USC 1915 and Federal Rules of Practice 24 for a 28 USC 2254 Motion(ECF No. 5 ) is DENIED as moot to the extent Applicant is seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Appli cants additional request for an order seeking discovery is DENIED. Applicants Motion for Modified Order Pertaining to Proposed 28 USC 2254 Which Stated Deficiencies (ECF No. 6 ) is DENIED, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 2/29/2016.(agarc, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 16-cv-00323-GPG
ARI M. LIGGETT,
Applicant,
v.
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO,
Respondent.

MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE GORDON P. GALLAGHER
Applicant’s “Motion to Proceed Indigently According to 28 USC 1915 and Federal
Rules of Practice 24 for a 28 USC 2254 Motion” (ECF No. 5) is DENIED as moot to the
extent Applicant is seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Applicant’s additional
request for an order seeking discovery is DENIED. Applicant’s “Motion for Modified
Order Pertaining to Proposed 28 USC 2254 Which Stated Deficiencies” (ECF No. 6) is
DENIED. If Applicant wishes to pursue any habeas corpus claims in this action he must
cure the remaining deficiency by filing on the proper form an Application for a Writ of
Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Applicant is directed to cure this
remaining deficiency within thirty (30) days from the date of this minute order.
Applicant is reminded that the action will be dismissed without further notice if he fails to
cure the remaining deficiency within the time allowed.
Dated: February 29, 2016