Estes Express Lines v. Golden Railings, Inc.

Filing 9

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 02/24/16 Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. Scheduling Conference set for 3/23/2016 10:00 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 16-cv-00341-CMA-NYW ESTES EXPRESS LINES, Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN RAILINGS, INC., Defendant. ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IT IS ORDERED that a Scheduling Conference is set for March 23, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom C-204, 2d Floor, Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse will be required to show valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2(b). A copy of the instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form of scheduling order can be downloaded from the court’s website at The parties or their counsel shall submit their proposed scheduling order, pursuant to District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) Procedures V.6.0, including a copy of the proposed scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to, on or before seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel/pro se parties in this case shall hold a prescheduling conference meeting and prepare a proposed Scheduling Order in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 and 26.1(a) on or before twenty-one days prior to the Scheduling Conference. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d) no discovery shall be sought until after the pre-scheduling conference meeting. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the parties shall comply with the mandatory disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) on or before fourteen days after the pre-scheduling conference meeting. DATED: February 24, 2016 BY THE COURT: s/Nina Y. Wang__________ United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?