Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Who Subscribed to Policy No. PGIARK00201 04 v. Aminokit Laboratories, Inc. et al

Filing 34

ORDER Denying 26 the defendants Aminokit Laboratories, Inc.; Tamea Rae Sisco and Leo Runnels motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/27/16. (ktera)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 16-cv-00412-RPM CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S LONDON WHO SUBSCRIBED TO POLICY NO. PG1ARK00201-04, Plaintiffs, v. AMINOKIT LABORATORIES, INC., a Colorado Corporation; TAMEA RAE SISCO, a natural person; JONATHAN LEE, MD, a natural person; LEO RUNNELS, a natural person; DENNIS THOMPSON, DC, a natural person; and NCMIC INSURANCE COMPANY, an Iowa Corporation; Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) _____________________________________________________________________ On April 14, 2016, the defendants Aminokit Laboratories, Inc.; Tamea Rae Sisco and Leo Runnels filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). (Doc. 26). The motion is based on a purported agreement not to pursue this case in connection with a settlement of the underlying lawsuit. Those are matters outside the allegations of the Amended Complaint and may not be considered under Rule 12(b)(6). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion is denied. DATED: April 27th, 2016 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch __________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?