Wang et al v. Weeks
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/19/16. Motion to Vacate Scheduling Conference # 6 is DENIED without prejudice. The Court sua sponte VACATES the Scheduling Conference set for June 16, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. and RESETS the Scheduling Conference for July 11, 2016 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom A401 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. (lgale, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 16-cv-00773-WJM-KLM
PING WANG, and,
JARED WEEKS, Officer,
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Vacate Scheduling
Conference [#6] (“Motion”). Plaintiffs move to vacate the scheduling conference set for
June 16, 2016 on the basis that Plaintiffs’ counsel has a trial scheduled for that week.
Plaintiffs have not conferred with Defendant pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1, noting that
Defendant has not yet been served and no counsel has entered an appearance. However,
nothing in D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(b) waives the conferral requirement in such a
circumstance. Further, there is no indication that the Motion has been sent or served on
Defendant as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a)(1)(D). In the absence of such,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#6] is DENIED without prejudice.
Nonetheless, in the interest of expedience, the Court sua sponte VACATES the Scheduling
Conference set for June 16, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. and RESETS the Scheduling Conference
for July 11, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom A-401 of the Alfred A. Arraj United States
Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit their proposed scheduling
order pursuant to the District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) Procedures. The
parties shall submit the proposed scheduling order no later than July 5, 2016.
Dated: April 19, 2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?