Berryman v. Wilcox et al

Filing 68

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Status Conference held on 6/22/2017 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The Final Pretrial Conferences are converted to Status Conferences. The court will re-set Final Pretrial Conferences in these matters if necessary after the disposition of the pending dispositive motions. Defendants are granted leave to file supplementation to the Motion for Summary Judgment on or before June 28, 2017. FTR: Courtroom C-204. (bwilk, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE NINA Y. WANG

Civil Action:
Civil Action:
Courtroom Deputy:

16-cv-00782-RM-NYW
16-cv-01619-RM-NYW
Brandy Wilkins

Parties
MICHAEL BERRYMAN,

Date: June 22, 2017
FTR: NYW COURTROOM C-204*
Attorney(s)
pro se (via telephone)

Plaintiff,
v.
LT. WILCOX,
LT. WADAS,
LT. JOHN DOE I,
B.O.P. OFFICER JOHN DOE I,
B.O.P. OFFICER JOHN DOE II,
A.W. CLINE,
CAPTAIN ERWIN,
LT. JOHN DOE II,
B.O.P. OFFICER JOHN DOE III,
B.O.P. OFFICER JOHN DOE IV,

Juan G. Villasenor
Joshua A. Hansen-King

Defendants.
&
MICHAEL BERRYMAN,

pro se (via telephone)

Plaintiff,
v.
USA,

Juan G. Villasenor
Joshua A. Hansen-King
Defendant.

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

STATUS CONFERENCE
Court in Session: 1:02 p.m.
Appearance of counsel and pro se Plaintiff.
Parties discuss Plaintiff’s involvement in creating the Final Pretrial Orders submitted to the court.
He did not have the necessary tools to be meaningfully involved.
The Final Pretrial Conferences are converted to Status Conferences. The court will re-set Final
Pretrial Conferences in these matters if necessary after the disposition of the pending dispositive
motions.
Plaintiff should focus on his response to the Motion for Summary Judgment, which is due on July
24, 2017.
Defendants request leave to file supplementation to the Motion for Summary Judgment.
ORDERED: Defendants are granted leave to file supplementation to the Motion for
Summary Judgment on or before June 28, 2017. No new argument will be
permitted, but Defendants are permitted leave to provide additional authority
for existing arguments.
Plaintiff inquires on the status of his Motion Objecting Recommendation for Consolidation of
Cases [40] filed November 14, 2016. The court does not see this on the docket as a pending
motion, but will review the status.
Plaintiff submits an oral motion to appoint counsel. The court advises that the motion needs to be
made in writing for the presiding judge to consider. Plaintiff indicates he also send a written copy
in the mail today.
Court in Recess: 1:21 p.m.

Hearing concluded.

Total time in Court: 00:19

* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Stevens-Koenig Reporting at [phone].

-2-