Dalrymple v. Corrections Corp. of America et al

Filing 83

ORDER: Mr. Dalrymple's 73 Motion to Stay Response Deadline is GRANTED. Mr. Dalrymple has until November 24, 2017, to prepare and submit his response. By Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/24/2017. (msklc3)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger
Civil Action No. 16-CV-0875-MSK-KMT
DAVID DALRYMPLE,
Plaintiff,
v.
LOIS A. ROSA, Assistant Warden, KCCC;
TAYLOR, Unit Manager, KCCC; and
SWARTZ, Property Officer, KCCC,
Defendants.

ORDER ON MOTION TO STAY RESPONSE DEADLINE

THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay Response
Deadline contained in his Response (# 73) to the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
For whatever reason, the motion to stay was not registered in the Court’s docketing
system as a pending motion. Regardless, the Court finds that good cause existed to stay his
response deadline in light of his Motion to Amend the Complaint (# 68). Now, given the Court’s
denial of that motion (# 80), and given Mr. Dalrymple's representation that he is ready to proceed
with a response to the motion for summary judgment in a letter dated October 18, 2017 (# 82),
Mr. Dalrymple’s motion to stay is GRANTED. Mr. Dalrymple has until November 24, 2017, to
prepare and submit his response. Mr. Dalrymple is free to move the Court for further extension,
but will need to establish good cause for doing so.

1

Dated this 24th day of October, 2017.
BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger
United States District Court

2