Wolhowe v. Produced Water Solutions et al

Filing 42

MINUTE ORDER Setting Pretrial Conference. A Pretrial Conference set for Wednesday, February 21, 2018, at 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 802 before Judge John L. Kane. Judge Kane's pretrial procedures require the parties to jointly submit proposed jury instructions no later than 30 days after the Pretrial Conference. ORDERED by Judge John L. Kane on 1/8/2018. (cthom, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 17-cv-00949-RM-KLM
ROYAL CREST DAIRY, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CONTINENTAL WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court on the December 18, 2017, Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix (the “Recommendation”) (ECF No. 50) to deny
Defendant’s “Motion to Disqualify George Keys from Acting as Plaintiff’s Appraiser and For
Other Relief” (ECF No. 30). The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).
The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within
fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (ECF No. 50 at page 9.)
Despite this advisement, no objections to the Recommendation have to date been filed by any
party and the time to do so has expired. (See generally Docket.)
The Court concludes that Magistrate Judge Mix’s analysis was thorough and sound, and
that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) advisory
committee’s note (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there
is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”); see also

Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (“In the absence of timely objection, the
district court may review a magistrate’s report under any standard it deems appropriate.”). The
Recommendation is, therefore, adopted as an order of this Court.
In accordance with the foregoing, the Court:
(1)

ADOPTS the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 50)

in its entirety; and
(2)

DENIES Defendant’s Motion to Disqualify George Keys from Acting as

Plaintiff’s Appraiser and For Other Relief (ECF No. 30).
DATED this 8th day of January, 2018.
BY THE COURT:

____________________________________
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge

2