Jones v. Archuleta et al

Filing 20

MINUTE ORDER. Applicant's Motion for Expansion of the Record 18 and Supplement to Reply to Pre-Answer Response 19 filed June 6, 2017 are not signed. Applicant is directed to correct this omission within twenty-one days from the date of t his minute order or the documents will be stricken. The Court notes that Applicant indicates he previously filed a reply to Respondents' Pre-Answer Response 10 . Applicant is advised that no reply has been filed in this action. Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 06/08/17. (jhawk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 16-cv-03048-PAB BERNARD JONES, Applicant, v. LOU ARCHULETA, Warden, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Respondents. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer Applicant’s Motion for Expansion of the Record [Docket No. 18] and Supplement to Reply to Pre-Answer Response [Docket No. 19] filed June 6, 2017 are not signed. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[e]very pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed” and “[t]he court must strike an unsigned paper unless the omission is promptly corrected after being called to the . . . party’s attention.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). Applicant is directed to correct this omission within twenty-one days from the date of this minute order or the documents will be stricken. In addition, the Court notes that Applicant indicates he previously filed a reply to Respondents’ Pre-Answer Response [Docket No. 10]. Applicant is advised that no reply has been filed in this action. DATED June 8, 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?