Jones v. Archuleta et al

Filing 25

Minute Order. Applicant's Motion for Enlargement of Time 21 is GRANTED and the Court will consider Applicants arguments in the Reply to Pre-Answer Response [ 24] filed June 8, 2017. Applicant's Motion to Cure Deficiencies in Supplement to Reply to Pre-Answer Response 22 and Applicant's Motion to Cure Deficiencies in Motion for Expansion of the Record 23 are DENIED. If Applicant wants the Court to consider the documents that previously were submitted without signatures, he must submit new copies of those documents that are signed. Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 06/08/17. (jhawk, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 16-cv-03048-PAB
BERNARD JONES,
Applicant,
v.
LOU ARCHULETA, Warden, and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO,
Respondents.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer
Applicant’s Motion for Enlargement of Time [Docket No. 21] is GRANTED and the
Court will consider Applicant’s arguments in the Reply to Pre-Answer Response [Docket
No. 24] filed June 8, 2017. Applicant’s Motion to Cure Deficiencies in Supplement to
Reply to Pre-Answer Response [Docket No. 22] and Applicant’s Motion to Cure
Deficiencies in Motion for Expansion of the Record [Docket No. 23] are DENIED. If
Applicant wants the Court to consider the documents that previously were submitted
without signatures, he must submit new copies of those documents that are signed.
DATED June 9, 2017.