Doe v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al

Filing 52

ORDER. ORDERED that the Stipulation [sic] Motion for Entry of Order Directing Binding Arbitration and Stay of Action [Docket No. 48] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. ORDERED that, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, this action shall be administra tively closed and the parties shall proceed with arbitration in accordance with the terms in the parties Stipulation and Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate [Docket No. 48 at 2-4]. ORDERED that the request for a stay is denied. ORDERED that, no later than twenty days after the completion of the arbitration proceeding, the parties shall file a status report advising the Court whether they believe the case should be reopened for good cause for any further proceedings in this Court or whether the case may be dismissed by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 06/01/17. (jhawk, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Philip A. Brimmer
Civil Action No. 16-cv-03115-PAB-KMT
JANE DOE, an individual,
Plaintiff,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation,
UBER USA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and
RASIER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court on the Stipulation [sic] Motion for Entry of Order
Directing Binding Arbitration and Stay of Action [Docket No. 48] filed by plaintiff and
defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. and the parties’ Supplement to Stipulated Motion for
Entry of Order Directing Binding Arbitration, Stay of Action, and Adminstrative [sic]
Closure [Docket No. 50].
Plaintiff filed this action seeking to compel arbitration. Docket No. 1. Plaintiff
and defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. filed a motion requesting the Court to stay the
case and compel arbitration. Docket No. 48. The Court entered a minute order
requesting the positions of defendants Uber USA, LLC and Rasier, LLC with respect to
the motion and arbitration and whether the parties opposed administratively closing the
case in lieu of staying the case. Docket No. 49. The parties have responded that Uber
USA, LLC and Rasier, LLC were “included within ‘Uber’ for purposes of the Motion,

shall be bound by the Court’s order on the Motion, and shall be parties to and bound by
the results of the arbitration.” Docket No. 50 at 1, ¶ 1. The parties request that the
proceeding be both stayed and administratively closed. Id. at 1-2. The effect of
administrative closure is to terminate pending motions. D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2.
Wherefore, it is
ORDERED that the Stipulation [sic] Motion for Entry of Order Directing Binding
Arbitration and Stay of Action [Docket No. 48] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
It is further
ORDERED that, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, this action shall be
administratively closed and the parties shall proceed with arbitration in accordance with
the terms in the parties’ Stipulation and Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate [Docket No. 48
at 2-4]. It is further
ORDERED that the request for a stay is denied. It is further
ORDERED that, no later than twenty days after the completion of the arbitration
proceeding, the parties shall file a status report advising the Court whether they believe
the case should be reopened for good cause for any further proceedings in this Court or
whether the case may be dismissed.

DATED June 1, 2017.
BY THE COURT:

s/Philip A. Brimmer
PHILIP A. BRIMMER
United States District Judge

2