Lara v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Filing
43
ORDER: Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the case for lack of prosecution. by Judge William J. Martinez on 1/18/19. (jdyne, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 17-cv-0858-WJM-KMT
FRANK LARA,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,
Defendant.
ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Plaintiff Frank Lara (“Plaintiff” or “Mr. Lara”) passed away on November 28,
2017. (ECF No. 33.) On January 9, 2018, Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company
filed a Statement Noting Death pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(3).
(Id.) Thereafter, the Court set forth a procedure for informing all potentially interested
persons of their right to pursue the litigation, and directed Plaintiff’s counsel to deliver a
copy of the Statement Noting Death to each of Mr. Lara’s known beneficiaries, the
representative, if any, of Mr. Lara’s Estate, and the Probate Registrar of Weld County
Combined Courts, and the clerk of any other court with jurisdiction over Mr. Lara’s
estate. (ECF No. 41 at 4.) The Court also instructed any eligible individual or
representative to file a motion for substitution under Rule 25(a)(1) or notify the Court of
an intention to pursue the matter no later than October 9, 2018. (Id.) Finally, the Court
stated that absent a motion for substitution by that date, the Court would dismiss the
case without prejudice for lack of prosecution. (Id. at 5.)
To date, no motion for substitution has been received and the time for
substitution has elapsed. Therefore, consistent with its prior order, the Court ORDERS
the following:
1.
The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to administratively reopen the case;
2.
The Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the case for lack of prosecution;
and
3.
The Clerk SHALL TERMINATE this case.
Dated this 17th day of January, 2019.
BY THE COURT:
_______________________
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?