Crossroads American Baptist Church v. Guide One Insurance

Filing 75

ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 10/29/2019 re 51 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Guideone Mutual Insurance Company and 67 Fourth Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants Partial Motion for Summary Judgment (Breach of Contract) and Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs Second and Third Claims for Relief (Bad Faith). 67 Motion is GRANTED finding good cause shown. (tsher, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 18-cv-01256-REB-NRN CROSSROADS AMERICAN BAPTIST CHURCH, Plaintiff, v. GUIDEONE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Entered by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter Before this Court are two motions: (1) Defendant Guideone Mutual Insurance Company’s (“Guideone”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing, Dkt. #51, referred to the Court by Judge Robert E. Blackburn, Dkt. #52; and (2) Plaintiff Crossroads American Baptist Church’s (“Crossroads”) Fourth Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant’s Partial Motion for Summary Judgment (Breach of Contract) and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff’s Second and Third Claims for Relief (Bad Faith), Dkt. #67 (“Fourth Motion for Extension of Time”), also referred to the Court by Judge Blackburn, Dkt. # 70. On October 16, 2019, I heard oral argument by the parties on US General, LLC’s Motion to Permit Joinder, Dkt. #61, referred to the Court by Judge Blackburn, Dkt. #62, and Guideone’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing. Having considered the briefs, Dkt. ##51, 60 & 68; 61 & 69, and oral argument on both motions, I granted the Motion to Permit Joinder, ordered that US General, LLC be added as a Plaintiff, and reserved ruling on the Motion to Dismiss until the parties submitted either a stipulation or briefing on the issues remaining with respect to the Motion to Dismiss. See Dkt. #71. On October 25, 2019, in accordance with my order at the hearing, Crossroads and Guideone submitted a Stipulation to Dismiss Plaintiff Crossroads American Baptist Church and Second Claim for Relief, Dkt. #74, in which the parties stipulated to the dismissal of Crossroads, and that the claim for common law bad faith also be dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, with respect to Guideone’s Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. #51, this Court RECOMMENDS the following: 1. That Crossroads American Baptist Church be dismissed; 2. That Crossroads American Baptist Church be removed from the caption; and 3. That the Second Claim for Relief (common law bad faith) be dismissed with prejudice with Crossroads and Guideone each to bear its own costs and fees. Crossroads and Guideone also filed a Stipulation to Extend Deadlines to Respond to Guideone’s Motions for Summary Judgment, Dkt. #73, in which the parties stipulated that US General, LLC was substituted as a plaintiff and as such will be required to respond to Guideone’s motions for summary judgment. Id. The parties also stipulated to deadlines for US General to respond and Guideone to reply. See Dkt. #73. The Court construes the parties’ stipulations to mean that Guideone’s objection to the Fourth Motion for Extension of Time is withdrawn, making such motion unopposed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Fourth Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant’s Partial Motion for Summary Judgment (Breach of Contract) and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff’s Second and Third Claims for Relief (Bad Faith), Dkt. #67, is GRANTED finding good cause shown. It is further ORDERED that US General is directed to respond to Guideone’s motions for summary judgment, Dkt. ##28 & 30, on or before December 13, 2019, and Guideone is directed to submit its reply, if any, on or before December 20, 2019. Date: October 29, 2019 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?