Brighthouse Life Insurance Company v. Grimm et al
Filing
27
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 12 Motion to Deposit Funds into the Registry of the Court, for Dismissal, and for Attorneys' Fees. Plaintiff Brighthouse Life Insurance Company is ordered to deposit the Annuity assets at issue in this matter with the Clerk of the Court. Brighthouse is discharged from any further responsibility relating to the Annuity; this includes any liability whatsoever related to Brighthouse's payment of $18,980.28 to NPR, since Brighthouse made that pay ment prior to having any knowledge of the competing claims. Brighthouse is dismissed with prejudice from this action upon payment of the Annuity assets into the registry of the Court and is discharged from any and all liability whatsoever related t o the Annuity assets. Prior to depositing the Annuity assets into the registry of the Court, Brighthouse may deduct from them its attorneys' fees and costs incurred in pursuing this action, totaling $8,766.00. This dismissal is conditio ned upon Brighthouse's compliance with all subsequent orders of this Court in this action. This dismissal does not affect the claims of interpleading Defendants with respect to disposition of the Annuity assets. This action shall continue as among Defendants. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 09/21/2018. (athom, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Christine M. Arguello
Civil Action No. 18-cv-01289-CMA-NRN
BRIGHTHOUSE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
RUSSELL GRIMM, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Judith
G. Hill;
V-DAY;
NATIONAL FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION,
INC.; and
FIRST BOOK,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DEPOSIT FUNDS INTO THE
REGISTRY OF THE COURT, FOR DISMISSAL, AND FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
Interpleader Plaintiff Brighthouse Life Insurance Company (“Brighthouse”) has
moved this Court for leave to deposit annuity assets into the Registry of the Court, for
discharge and dismissal with prejudice, and for attorneys’ fees and costs. (Doc. # 12.)
Being fully informed, the Court orders as follows:
I.
1.
FACTS
This is a civil action in the nature of interpleader, seeking a determination by the
Court of the proper beneficiary or beneficiaries of Annuity Contract No. 3203434335
(the “Annuity”), issued to Judith G. Hill (“Hill”) prior to her death. See (Doc. # 12-1). The
contract is an inherited IRA.
2.
On or about April 7, 2010, Brighthouse issued the Annuity to Hill.
3.
In her application for the Annuity, Hill listed her brother, Defendant Russell
Grimm, as the beneficiary.
4.
Hill died on or about May 13, 2016.
5.
Prior to Hill’s passing, on or about January 31, 2016, she changed the
beneficiaries of the Annuity, removing Grimm and including Defendant V-Day,
Defendant National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association, Inc.,
Defendant First Book, and non-party NPR.
6.
In or around December 2016, Brighthouse paid NPR a death benefit of
$18,980.28 with respect to NPR’s claim under the Annuity.
7.
Commencing in February 2017, Brighthouse received correspondence from
Defendant Grimm’s attorney, representing both Defendant Grimm individually and Hill’s
Estate, challenging the change of beneficiary and claiming that many of the actions Hill
took prior to her death were invalid.
8.
On November 30, 2017, Defendant Grimm’s attorney sent additional
correspondence to Brighthouse, informing Brighthouse that the Denver Probate Court
had ruled that changes Hill had made to her Last Will and Testament were invalid. The
letter indicated that the changes to the beneficiary of the Annuity may well have been
invalid as well.
9.
Meanwhile, the other interpleader Defendants have claimed or may claim they
are entitled to their share of the remaining death benefit of the Annuity.
2
10.
Brighthouse is unable to determine who, under Colorado law, is the proper
beneficiary of the Annuity.
II.
11.
BRIGHTHOUSE IS ENTITLED TO ITS ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS
Brighthouse is entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees in connection with this
interpleader action. See, e.g., Transamerica Premier Ins. Co. v. Growney, 70 F.3d 123
(10th Cir. Nov. 13, 1995) (fees are normally awarded to interpleader plaintiff who is
disinterested, concedes its liability in full, deposits the disputed funds in court and seeks
discharge); U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Sidwell, 525 F.2d 472, 475 (10th Cir. 1975)
(recognizing the common practice of ordering reasonable attorneys’ fees paid to
interpleader plaintiff from funds deposited with court); Schirmer Stevedoring Co., Ltd. v.
Seaboard Stevedoring Corp., 306 F.2d 188, 193–94 (9th Cir. 1962) (interpleader
plaintiff should be awarded attorneys’ fees unless plaintiff contests issues with the
interpleaded parties).
12.
To date, Brighthouse has incurred attorneys’ fees and costs totaling $8,766.00.
Those fees were incurred in drafting the complaint, finding and serving the defendants,
drafting this motion, and otherwise managing the case. The Court finds Brighthouse’s
requested costs and fees to be reasonable.
III.
CONCLUSION
WHEREFORE, the Court GRANTS Brighthouse’s Motion (Doc. # 12) and
ORDERS as follows:
(1) Plaintiff Brighthouse Life Insurance Company is ordered to deposit the
Annuity assets at issue in this matter with the Clerk of the Court;
3
(2) Brighthouse is discharged from any further responsibility relating to the
Annuity; this includes any liability whatsoever related to Brighthouse’s payment of
$18,980.28 to NPR, since Brighthouse made that payment prior to having any
knowledge of the competing claims;
(3) Brighthouse is dismissed with prejudice from this action upon payment of the
Annuity assets into the registry of the Court and is discharged from any and all
liability whatsoever related to the Annuity assets; and
(4) Prior to depositing the Annuity assets into the registry of the Court,
Brighthouse may deduct from them its attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in
pursuing this action, totaling $8,766.00.
(5) This dismissal is conditioned upon Brighthouse’s compliance with all
subsequent orders of this Court in this action.
(6) This dismissal does not affect the claims of interpleading Defendants with
respect to disposition of the Annuity assets. This action shall continue as among
Defendants.
DATED: September 21, 2018
BY THE COURT:
_______________________________
CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO
United States District Judge
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?