Northington v. Tuttoilmando
ORDER. The Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the 27 Recommendation, GRANTS the 15 Motion to Dismiss, and directs the Clerk to CLOSE this case. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 11/17/2022.(sdunb, )
Case 1:21-cv-03064-RM-NRN Document 28 Filed 11/17/22 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 21-cv-03064-RM-NRN
AIMEE TUTTOILMONDO, in her official capacity as Unit Manager at Florence ADMAX,
Before the Court is the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge N. Reid
Neureiter (ECF No. 27) to grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 15). The
Recommendation advised that specific written objections were due within fourteen days after
being served a copy of the Recommendation. More than fourteen days have elapsed since the
Recommendation was issued, and no objection has been filed.
“In the absence of a timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge’s
report under any standard it deems appropriate.” Summers v. Utah, 927 F.3d 1165, 1167 (10th
Construing Plaintiff’s pro se pleadings liberally, the magistrate judge determined that his
claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was barred by sovereign immunity and that he failed to
state claim for violation of his rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court
finds the magistrate judge’s analysis was sound and discerns no error on the face of the record.
Case 1:21-cv-03064-RM-NRN Document 28 Filed 11/17/22 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
The Recommendation is incorporated into this Order by reference. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Recommendation (ECF No. 27),
GRANTS the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 15), and directs the Clerk to CLOSE this case.
DATED this 17th day of November, 2022.
BY THE COURT:
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?