Haddock, et al v. Nationwide, et al
Filing
599
Minute Entry for Proceedings held before Judge Stefan R. Underhill: Fairness Hearing held on 3/31/2015 regarding 597 MOTION for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and 598 MOTION for Attorney Fees. Oral ruling by Judge Stefan R. Underhill taking under advisement 597 Motion for Settlement and 598 Motion for Attorney Fees. Total Time: 57 minutes (Court Reporter Susan Catucci). (Pannu, C.)
Civil- (Dec-2008)
HONORABLE: Stefan R. Underhill
DEPUTY CLERK Rody Jaiman / C. Pannu RPTR/ECRO/TAPESusan Catucci
hours 57 minutes
DATE: 3/31/2015
START TIME: 2:00 p.m.
END TIME: 4:11 p.m.
TOTAL TIME: 0
LUNCH RECESS
RECESS (if more than ½ hr)
FROM:
FROM: 2:56 p.m.
TO:
TO: 4:10 p.m.
CIVIL NO. 3:01-cv-1552 (SRU)
Lou Haddock, et al.,
Richard Bieder, William Bloss, Marc Stanley
Plaintiff’s Counsel
vs
Elizabeth Canizares, Thomas Klauss, Charles Plat
Nationwide Financial Services, et al.
Defendant’s Counsel
COURTROOM MINUTES- CIVIL
Motion hearing
Show Cause Hearing
Evidentiary Hearing
Judgment Debtor Exam
Miscellaneous Hearing
.....# 597 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement
granted
denied
advisement
.....# 598 Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs and Incentive Awards
granted
denied
advisement
.....#
Motion
granted
denied
advisement
.....#
Motion
granted
denied
advisement
.....#
Motion
granted
denied
advisement
.....#
Motion
granted
denied
advisement
.....#
Motion
granted
denied
advisement
.....
Oral Motion
granted
denied
advisement
.....
Oral Motion
granted
denied
advisement
.....
Oral Motion
granted
denied
advisement
Oral Motion
granted
denied
advisement
.....
.....
Briefs(s) due
Proposed Findings due
Response due
.............
filed
docketed
.............
filed
docketed
.............
filed
docketed
.............
filed
docketed
.............
filed
docketed
.............
............
filed
docketed
Hearing continued until
at
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?