Haddock, et al v. Nationwide, et al

Filing 599

Minute Entry for Proceedings held before Judge Stefan R. Underhill: Fairness Hearing held on 3/31/2015 regarding 597 MOTION for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and 598 MOTION for Attorney Fees. Oral ruling by Judge Stefan R. Underhill taking under advisement 597 Motion for Settlement and 598 Motion for Attorney Fees. Total Time: 57 minutes (Court Reporter Susan Catucci). (Pannu, C.)

Download PDF
Civil- (Dec-2008) HONORABLE: Stefan R. Underhill DEPUTY CLERK Rody Jaiman / C. Pannu RPTR/ECRO/TAPESusan Catucci hours 57 minutes DATE: 3/31/2015 START TIME: 2:00 p.m. END TIME: 4:11 p.m. TOTAL TIME: 0 LUNCH RECESS RECESS (if more than ½ hr) FROM: FROM: 2:56 p.m. TO: TO: 4:10 p.m. CIVIL NO. 3:01-cv-1552 (SRU) Lou Haddock, et al., Richard Bieder, William Bloss, Marc Stanley Plaintiff’s Counsel vs Elizabeth Canizares, Thomas Klauss, Charles Plat Nationwide Financial Services, et al. Defendant’s Counsel COURTROOM MINUTES- CIVIL Motion hearing Show Cause Hearing Evidentiary Hearing Judgment Debtor Exam Miscellaneous Hearing .....# 597 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement granted denied advisement .....# 598 Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs and Incentive Awards granted denied advisement .....# Motion granted denied advisement .....# Motion granted denied advisement .....# Motion granted denied advisement .....# Motion granted denied advisement .....# Motion granted denied advisement ..... Oral Motion granted denied advisement ..... Oral Motion granted denied advisement ..... Oral Motion granted denied advisement Oral Motion granted denied advisement ..... ..... Briefs(s) due Proposed Findings due Response due ............. filed docketed ............. filed docketed ............. filed docketed ............. filed docketed ............. filed docketed ............. ............ filed docketed Hearing continued until at

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?