Lewis v. Commissioner

Filing 200

DISCOVERY ORDER (see attached) and corresponding Exhibits. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on May 3, 2013. (Dorais, L.)

Download PDF
Case 3:03-cv-00196-CSH Document 198-2 Filed 05/02/13 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SCOTT TALMADJE LEWIS, : : : : : : : : : : Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION, Respondent. CASE NO. 3:03CV196 (CSH) PETITIONER’S FOURTH INTERROGATORIES TO THE NEW HAVEN POLICE DEPARTMENT Pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Petitioner requests that Respondent answer the following interrogatories, under oath, within ten (10) days. If you cannot fully answer the following interrogatories, after exercising due diligence to obtain the information to do so, please state so and answer to the extent possible, specifying your inability to answer the remainder, and stating whatever information or knowledge you have concerning the unanswered portions. These interrogatories shall be deemed continuing, so as to require supplemental responses as new and/or different information is required. 1. Was Frank Graham (see Death Certificate attached as Ex. 3) one of the confidential informants mentioned in Officer Trocchio’s Case/Incident Report for Complaint Number 59467, dated 06-07-1990 (attached as Ex. 4)? ANSWER: 1   Case 3:03-cv-00196-CSH Document 198-2 Filed 05/02/13 Page 2 of 3 2. If Frank Graham was one of the several confidential informants mentioned in Officer Trocchio’s Case/Incident Report (attached as Ex. 4), use the language of that report (i.e., “CI #1,” “CI # 2,” “Known and Reliable Sources/Confidential Informants,” “a Known and Reliable Informant That Has Been Used by This Officer in Over Sixty (60) Narcotic Related Investigations,” etc.) to specifically identify which of these informants was Frank Graham. ANSWER: 3. Was one of the confidential informants mentioned in Officer Trocchio’s Case/Incident Report for Complaint Number 59467, dated 06-07-1990 (attached as Ex. 4) the same confidential informant mentioned in Detective Maher’s Case/Incident Report for Complaint Number 111567, dated 12-04-1990 (attached as Ex. 5)? ANSWER: 4. If one of confidential informants identified in Officer Trocchio’s Case/Incident Report (attached as Ex. 4) was also the confidential informant identified in Detective Maher’s Case/Incident Report (attached as Ex. 5), specifically identify that informant using the language of Officer Trocchio’s report (i.e., “CI #1,” “CI # 2,” “Known and Reliable Sources/Confidential Informants,” “a Known and Reliable Informant That Has Been Used by This Officer in Over Sixty (60) Narcotic Related Investigations,” etc.). ANSWER: 2   Case 3:03-cv-00196-CSH Document 198-2 Filed 05/02/13 Page 3 of 3 Respectfully submitted, By ____/s/_____________________ Date: May 2, 2013 Brett Dignam Attorney for Petitioner Scott T. Lewis CT 00283 Morningside Heights Legal Services, Inc. 435 West 116th Street - Room 831 New York, NY 10027 212-854-4291 Fax: 212-854-3554 Email: bdigna@law.columbia.edu 3  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?