Mack v. Bridgeport et al
Filing
69
ORDER denying 67 Motion for Reconsideration. PLEASE READ FULL TEXT OF ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 9/25/10. (Macare, L.)
<![CDATA[
Mack v. Bridgeport et al
Doc. 69
Case 3:06-cv-00957-RNC Document 69
Filed 09/27/10 Page 1 of 1
September 25, 2010 Mack v. Bridgeport, No. 06-CV-957(RNC) Re: Motion for Reconsideration (doc. 67): Denied. The standard for granting a motion for reconsideration is "strict." Shrader v. CSX Transp., 70 F.3d 255, 257 (2d Cir. 1995). "[R]econsideration will generally be denied unless the moving party can point to controlling decisions or data that the court overlooked - matters, in other words, that might reasonably be expected to alter the conclusion reached by the court." Id. Plaintiff does not meet this strict standard. Rather, she seeks to relitigate matters that the Court previously considered, as the defendants correctly argue in their objection. Accordingly, the motion for reconsideration is hereby denied. So ordered. /s/ Robert N. Chatigny Robert N. Chatigny, U.S.D.J.
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
