Gerber Scientific, Inc. v. Roland DGA Corp

Filing 149

ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendant's motion 139 to compel. See attached ruling. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 1/27/10. (Constantine, A.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT GERBER SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. ROLAND DGA CORPORATION, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : No. 3:06CV2024(CFD) Ruling on Defendant's Motion to Compel The plaintiff, Gerber Scientific International Inc., brings this patent infringement action against the defendant, Roland DGA Corp. compel. Pending before the court is the defendant's motion to (Doc. #139.) Having considered the arguments made by the parties in their papers and during oral argument, the motion is granted in part and denied in part as follows: 1. Interrogatory 5 tracks the text of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and The plaintiff's answer, in which it cited to is unobjectionable. the deposition testimony of the defendant's witnesses, is not sufficient. granted. The defendant's motion to compel a response is The plaintiff shall provide a supplemental verified response as to those individuals who have not been deposed. 2. Interrogatory 6 requests, inter alia, that the plaintiff The motion to compel is identify the relevant area of art(s). granted. response. 3. The plaintiff shall provide a supplemental verified Interrogatory 7 is denied as moot. The plaintiff did not assert an objection and during oral argument, the defendant represented that there was no further dispute as to this request. SO ORDERED at Hartford, Connecticut this 27th day of January, 2010. _________/s/__________________ Donna F. Martinez United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?