Skakel v. Murphy

Filing 30

Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment by Michael C. Skakel.Responses due by 11/17/2008 (Seeley, Hope)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT MICHAEL C. SKAKEL Petitioner, v. PETER J. MURPHY, Respondent. : : : : : : : CASE NO. 3:07 CV 1625 (PCD) OCTOBER 27, 2008 PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c), the Petitioner, Michael C. Skakel, hereby moves the Court to grant his Motion for Summary Judgment, as there exists no genuine material fact concerning the matters alleged in the Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus. In support of his motion, the Petitioner submits a memorandum of law in support of their motion and individual statements pursuant to Local Rule 56(a) stating that there are no genuine issues as to any material facts and that the Petitioner is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. WHEREFORE, the Petitioner respectfully requests that the Court grant his Motion for Summary Judgment. THE PETITIONER, MICHAEL C. SKAKEL BY /s/__________ ___________ HUBERT J. SANTOS Federal Bar No. ct00069 Email: HOPE C. SEELEY Federal Bar No. ct 4863 Email: SANDRA SNADEN KUWAYE Federal Bar No. ct18586 Email: SANTOS & SEELEY, P.C. 51 Russ Street Hartford, CT 06106 Tel: (860) 249-6548 Fax:(860) 724-5533 2 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that on October 27, 2008, a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically and served by mail on anyone unable to accept electronic filing. Notice of this filing will be sent by email to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system or by mail on anyone unable to accept electronic filing as indicated on the Notice of Electronic Filing. Parties may access this filing through the Court's CM/ECF System. Michael O'Hare, Esq. Office of the Chief State's Attorney 300 Corporate Place Rocky Hill, CT 06067 Tel. No. (860) 258-5887 Fax No. (860) 258-5968 E-mail: Federal Bar No. ct 05318 _/s/___________________________ HOPE C. SEELEY 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?