Skakel v. Murphy

Filing 63

Memorandum in Opposition re 43 First MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas CorpusFirst MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Peter J. Murphy. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix)(O'Hare, Michael)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT MICHAEL C. SKAKEL, Petitioner, v. PETER J. MURPHY, Respondent. : : : : : March 3, 2009 Case No. 3:07 CV 1625 (PCD) NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING Please take notice that the respondent, Peter J. Murphy, has manually filed Appendices A-F to his "Memorandum in Opposition to Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Amend Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus," his "Memorandum in Opposition to Petitioner's Motion for Stay and Abeyance" and his "Memorandum in Opposition to Petitioner's Motion for Hearing to Set Bail." These documents have not been filed electronically because: [X] [] [] the documents cannot be converted to an electronic format the electronic file size of the documents exceeds 5 MB Plaintiff/Def endant is excused from filing these documents by Court order. The documents have been manually served on all parties. Respectfully submitted, W ARDEN PETER J. MURPHY MacDOUGALL-WALKER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION RESPONDENT By: /s/ Michael E. O'Hare MICHAEL E. O'HARE Supervisory Assistant State's Attorney Office of the Chief State's Attorney 300 Corporate Place Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067-1829 Tel. No. (860) 258-5887 Fax No. (860) 258-5968 Federal Bar No. ct 05318 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed, first class postage prepaid, to counsel for the petitioner: Attorney Hope C. Seeley, Attorney Hubert J. Santos and Attorney Sandra L. Snaden, Santos and Seeley, P.C., 51 Russ Street, Hartford, Connecticut, 06106, Tel. No. (860) 249-6548, Fax No. (860) 724-5533, on March 3, 2009. /s/ Michael E. O'Hare MICHAEL E. O'HARE Supervisory Assistant State's Attorney

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?