Demaj v. Sakaj

Filing 133

ORDER denying without prejudice to renew, as appropriate 67 Motion in Limine. SEE ATTACHED ELECTRONIC ENDORSEMENT ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 8/17/2012. (Watson, M.)

DEMAJ v. SAKAJ, 09 CV 255 (JGM)
8/17/12 – ELECTRONIC ENDORSEMENT ON RESPONDENT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO
EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF LATE-DISCLOSED EXPERT, filed 1/27/12 (Dkt. #67)
While there was substantial disagreement between the parties regarding the scope
of evidence to be presented at the continued trial, commencing on September 5, 2012,
during yesterday's telephonic status conference (see Dkt. #129), all counsel did agree that
the only witnesses who will testify on September 5-10, 2012 will be the two fact witnesses,
Respondent Frida Sakaj and Guardian Ad Litem Jennifer Davis, and the one or two expert
witnesses, Dr. David Mantell and Dr. Benjamin Garber, will not testify until October 9-12,
2012, as appropriate.
Therefore, Respondent's Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Late-Disclosed
Expert (Dkt. #67) is denied without prejudice to renew, as appropriate, after the September
session of trial has been completed.